Artiglio

Les Sorenson v. Artiglio

Good Law
13 F. App'x 653
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 2001No. 00-56144; B.A.P. No. CC-99-01797-KMaJCalifornia291 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

E. Les Sorenson, Executive Director of the California State Board of Equalization (“SBE”), appeals a judgment of the Bank *654 ruptcy Appellate Panel reversing the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Carmine Artiglio’s adversary proceeding on sovereign immunity grounds. Artiglio brought an action against Sorenson under Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 , 28 S.Ct. 441 , 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908), seeking a declaratory judgment from the bankruptcy court that certain state sales taxes he owed to the SBE were discharged in his Chapter 7 proceeding and seeking injunctive relief barring Sorenson from taking further action to collect such taxes. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties; they are not restated here except as necessary.

Sorenson contends that Artiglio’s action falls within one of the exceptions to the Ex Parte Young doctrine the Supreme Court articulated in Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe, 521 U.S. 261 , 117 S.Ct. 2028 , 138 L.Ed.2d 438 (1997), and Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 , 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996). Sorenson further contends that the State is the real party in interest in Artiglio’s adversary proceeding, and hence that this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.