Ochoa-Silva

United States v. Ochoa-Silva

Good Law
13 F. App'x 727
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 2001No. 99-10088; D.C. No. CR-98-01386-RCCCalifornia226 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Ochoa-Silva appeals his single count conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326 (a) and 1326(b)(2).

Ochoa-Silva’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Ochoa-Silva did not file a pro se supplemental brief.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998) (waiver of right to appeal is valid if knowing and voluntary), we enforce the waiver, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

We REMAND to the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2), consistent with United States v. Riverar-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir.2000). United States v. Herreras-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.