UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Paul GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
81 F.3d 846·96 Daily Journal DAR 4292·1996 WL 183181·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7815
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 199694-10520California4,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

This case gives fresh meaning to the phrase, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help you.”

I

The facts alleged by the defendant, Steven Paul Gomez, are troubling. In late February or early March of 1992, Gomez was being held in the Sacramento County Jail on state-law charges when he learned from his attorney that he had been acquitted. After Gomez told his fellow inmates the good news, one of them asked whether this meant he would be released. Gomez said yes, and the other inmate, a man by the name of Imran Mir, offered him a job. Mir was charged with participating in an international drug conspiracy and wanted Gomez to kill six witnesses who were going to testify against him. Mir offered Gomez $10,000 or half a kilogram of heroin for each witness he managed to knock off.

Gomez promptly reported Mir’s offer to the jail guards. He did so out of a sense of moral obligation, expecting no reward. The customs agent who had been working on Mir’s drug case was notified and eventually got in touch with Gomez. After the agent promised to keep Gomez’s identity secret and protect him if his identity were revealed, Gomez agreed to help the government gather evidence against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.