David Knickerbocker v. City of Stockton, a California Municipal Corporation, George Lerner, Ralph Womack and Kenneth Wilbon

Good Law
81 F.3d 907·96 Daily Journal DAR 4577·1996 WL 189791·3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 453·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8712
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 199695-15011California2,535 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

OVERVIEW

Appellant David Knickerbocker (“Knickerbocker”) is a sergeant with the City of Stockton Police Department (“C.S.P.D.”). Knickerbocker appeals from the District Court’s entry of judgment for Defendant-Appellees on Knickerbocker’s retaliation claim under the FLSA.

JURISDICTION

The District Court had jurisdiction over the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . The final judgment of the District Court was entered on December 1, 1994. This Court has jurisdiction over the appeal from the final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Knickerbocker is a sworn police sergeant employed by the C.S.P.D. Knickerbocker is also a Board Member of the Stockton Police Officers Association (“S.P.O.A.”). Appellees are the City of Stockton (“the City”), Deputy Chief of Police Kenneth Wilbon, Captain Ralph Womack, and Lieutenant George Lerner. During the period in question, Captain Womack was temporarily assigned to the rank of Acting Deputy Chief of Police; Lieutenant Lerner was the Acting Captain of Police during the same period.

In April, 1991, four officers of the Los Angeles Police Department were acquitted in state court of charges arising out of the beating of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.