Leguizamo-Pena

United States v. Leguizamo-Pena

Good Law
14 F. App'x 947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 2001No. 00-10527; D.C. No. CR-00-00769-FRZCalifornia492 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Adan Leguizamo-Pena (“Leguizamo”) appeals the district court’s application of a sixteen level sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 for his conviction of an aggravated felony prior to deportation. Specifically, Leguizamo argues that the enhancement was inappropriate because the state of Kentucky placed him on conditional discharge less than ten days after sentencing, and therefore he did not receive a term of imprisonment of at least one year for his prior conviction as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(R) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

On November 14, 1995, Leguizamo was convicted in a Kentucky state court of two counts of Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree, and on April *948 19, 1996, he was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment. On April 24, 1996, the state court ordered that Leguizamo’s sentence be conditionally discharged, effective upon his being taken into the custody of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. After being deported in 1996, Leguizamo was found in Arizona on April 19, 2000 and pled guilty to illegal re-entry after deportation on May 26,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.