Antonio Flor Chanco Maria Ofelia San Miguel Chanco v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
82 F.3d 298·96 Daily Journal DAR 4546·1996 WL 187450·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8488·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2731
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 199694-70738California1,948 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Antonio Flor Chanco (“Chanco”) and Maria Ofelia San Miguel Chanco, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of the Chancos’ request for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a) and 1253(h). Chanco argues the BIA abused its discretion by determining that his fear of prosecution by the Philippine government for his participation in a coup d’etat is not a well founded fear of persecution for his political opinion. He also contends he will be subjected to disproportionate punishment because of his family’s friendship with the Marcos family, and that his nine-year service in the military renders him particularly subject to persecution by rebel forces in the Philippines.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We deny review because what Chanco faces is not persecution but prosecution for his crime against the Philippine government, a crime for which he has not shown his punishment will be disproportionate. We also conclude that because Chanco has failed to show that he would be singled out for retribution by the rebels, his fear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.