Meza-Casillas

United States v. Meza-Casillas

Good Law
15 F. App'x 408
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 2001No. 00-10282; D.C. No. CR-99-00424-1-JBRCalifornia354 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Meza-Casillas was convicted of being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326(b). He argues that a 16 point enhancement under the sentencing guidelines based on a prior aggravated felony was inappropriate.

In the district court, Meza-Casillas expressly conceded that his past crime was classified as an “aggravated felony” under the statute and sentencing guidelines, but argued that a downward departure should be granted because his predicate felony was less serious than most of those so classified. On appeal he argues that the district court had an insufficient basis for so characterizing the past crime, because of the absence of a citation and because, arguably, the statute could be construed so that his initial sentence on the earlier crime would have prevented an “aggravated felony” classification. Assuming without deciding that either or both arguments would have been well taken, the error, if any, was not “plain.” A “plain” error means an error that “is so clear-cut, so obvious a competent district court judge should be able to avoid it without benefit of [any] objection.” 1 The error here, if any, does not meet that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.