United States v. A.G.E. Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
15 F. App'x 439
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 2001No. 00-10188, 00-10194, 00-10195; D.C. No. CR-N-95-049-HDMCalifornia3,142 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*442 MEMORANDUM

Appellants A.G.E. Enterprises, Inc. and A.G.E. Corporation, Inc. (collectively “A.G.E.”) and Shirley Colletti (“Colletti”) appeal their jury convictions for wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 , and RICO activities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c) and (d) and 18 U.S.C. § 1963 . Appellants contend that there were various errors in the proceedings below.

A. Bankruptcy Fraud Not Necessary for Wire Fraud Convictions

The superceding indictment is very specific with respect to the wire fraud charged in Counts Eight through Twenty-Eight. Although the counts incorporate by reference the factual allegations of Count Four, which detail Joseph Con-forte’s (“Conforte”) use of the wires to commit bankruptcy fraud, the counts also allege a separate scheme to defraud the IRS, including specific details as to appellants’ involvement in the scheme. For example, the indictment describes how A.G.E. was created solely to hide Con-forte’s Mustang Ranch income from the IRS. The superceding indictment alleges that the defendants, including Colletti, would, at Conforte’s directions, wire money from A.G.E.’s accounts in the United States to foreign accounts for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.