Home Haven, Inc. v. United States

Good Law
17 F. App'x 512
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 31, 2001No. 99-17322California282 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Home Haven, Inc. brought this wrongful levy action arguing that it was entitled to be equitably subrogated to the rights of the former senior lienholder in the property. The district court disagreed and granted summary judgment to the government holding that equitable subrogation does not apply where the party has actual notice of a preexisting subordinate encumbrance. This appeal followed. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties; they are not restated herein except as necessary.

Equitable subrogation is a state-law doctrine and therefore whether it applies here turns on Nevada law. As we have noted, “[tjhere is limited Nevada authority on the doctrine of equitable subrogation.” Mort v. United States 86 F.3d 890, 893 (9th Cir.1996). “Where Nevada law is lacking, its courts have looked to the law of other jurisdictions, particularly California, for guidance.” Id. In keeping with this tradition, we too have looked to the law of other jurisdictions, particularly California, to supplement Nevada’s equitable subrogation jurisprudence. See id. at 893-94 .

In Han v. United States 944 F.2d 526 (9th Cir.1991), we noted that under California law “equitable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.