Alfaro-Rojas

United States v. Alfaro-Rojas

Good Law
17 F. App'x 644
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 2001No. 00-10044; D.C. No. CR-99-05135-1-AWICalifornia293 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sergio Alfaro-Rojas appeals from his 108-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. *645 § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm.

Alfaro-Rojas first contends that he should have received a three-level reduction in his sentence for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to USSG § 3El.l(a) and (b), based upon his initial confession and limited defense at trial. We review this contention for clear error, giving deference to the sentencing judge’s finding. United States v. Gonzalez, 897 F.2d 1018, 1019 (9th Cir.1990). This contention fails.

The district court properly found that Alfaro-Rojas did not demonstrate acceptance of responsibility. He pleaded not guilty, attacked the validity of his confession, refused to discuss his case with the probation officer, and made no statement of contrition at sentencing. See United States v. Innie, 7 F.3d 840, 848 (9th Cir. 1993). Because Alfaro-Rojas did not qualify for the two-level adjustment under USSG § 3El.l(a), he was ineligible for the third point. See USSG § 3El.l(b).

Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.