Aviles-Garcia

United States v. Aviles-Garcia

Good Law
17 F. App'x 674
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 2001No. 00-50575; D.C. No. CR-00-00721-NAJCalifornia301 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Mireya Aviles-Garcia appeals the 18-month sentence imposed by the district court following her guilty-plea conviction for importation of approximately 40.80 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Aviles-Garcia contends that the district court erred by finding that an unconvicted drug seizure was relevant conduct for purposes of determining the attributable quantity of marijuana, resulting in an increase to her offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 and a violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We review a district court’s interpretation of the guidelines de novo and factual findings for clear error. United States v. Castillo, 181 F.3d 1129, 1134-35 (9th Cir.1999).

The district court here determined beyond a reasonable doubt that marijuana seized in a prior drug seizure was relevant conduct pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3 because it involved an ongoing course of behavior within a short time interval and, therefore, Aviles-Garcia was accountable for a combined total of 73.94 kilograms of marijuana making her base offense level…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.