Ojeda-Agundez

United States v. Ojeda-Agundez

Good Law
18 F. App'x 533
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 2001No. 00-50292; D.C. No. CR-99-00038-RT-1California246 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Raymond Ojeda-Agundez appeals his conviction and 46 month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Ojeda-Agundez contends that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), overruled Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), and requires that his sentence be *534 remanded for re-sentencing to a term of no more than two-years incarceration because the indictment did not charge, Ojeda did not admit, and the court did not find beyond a reasonable doubt the fact that he was previously convicted of an aggravated felony prior to his deportation in 1998.

This claim is foreclosed in light of our decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 , (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1503 , 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001), where we explicitly concluded that Almendarez-Torres survived Apprendi and rejected the argument raised by Ojeda-Agundez. Id. at 414-15 (concluding that “nowhere does Apprendi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.