Clara Hamilton v. County of Los Angeles, Kelly Enos, Paul McCready David Hogan Rosanna Taylor, Edward O'neil, John Blenker v. Michael Weiss, Lee Maxie

82 F.3d 422 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Clara HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Kelly Enos, Paul McCready, David Hogan Rosanna Taylor, Edward O'Neil, John Blenker, Defendants-Appellees, v. Michael WEISS, Lee Maxie, Appellants. No. 95-55357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lee Maxie appeals the district court's striking of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration and imposition of sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. We review a district court's standing determination de novo, see Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1523 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2707 and 115 S.Ct. 311 (1994), and the imposition of sanctions for abuse of discretion, Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp., 929 F.2d 1358 , 1365-66 (9th Cir.1990). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291…