Dion Clark v. Janice Mayfield David Schluter "Mr." Castenada Jesse Cote Does, 1-100

82 F.3d 422 77 A.F.T.R.2d 96 -1570 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dion CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janice MAYFIELD; David Schluter; "Mr." Castenada; Jesse Cote; Does, 1-100, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dion Clark appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against employees of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on the grounds that the complaint failed to satisfy the pleading requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Under Rule 8(a), a pleading shall contain: (1) "a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends," and (2) "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). A complaint that fails…