Ginn Doose v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Standard Federal Savings Bank

82 F.3d 422 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ginn DOOSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; * Standard Federal Savings Bank, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55125. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 5, 1996. Before: SNEED, PREGERSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. ** 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Ginn Doose appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of her complaint against the Resolution Trust Corporation ("RTC"), as receiver for Standard Federal Savings Bank ("Standard"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, see Hata v. United States, 23 F.3d 230, 232 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm. 3 Under FIRREA, 1 claimants must first present their claim to the RTC for administrative consideration. The RTC has 180 days after receiving the claim to allow or disallow the claim. 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(5)(A)(i). The claimant then has 60 days to seek administrative review of the…