Jackson v. Gomez

Good Law
82 F.3d 422·1996 WL 154533·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21670
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 199695-55930California331 words

Opinion

Opinion

82 F.3d 422 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Al Tyrone JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James H. GOMEZ, Director, California Department of Corrections; California Department of Corrections; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-55930. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Al Tyrone Jackson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his jury conviction for first degree residential burglary. Jackson contends (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) he was not given sufficient time to retain private counsel of his choice after he discharged his public defender, (3) insufficient evidence of identity supported his conviction, and (4) the identification procedures were tainted. We have jurisdiction under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.