In Re Daniel C. Chadwick, Debtor. Daniel C. Chadwick v. Hyman Danoff

82 F.3d 422 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Daniel C. CHADWICK, Debtor. Daniel C. CHADWICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hyman DANOFF, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-55144. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel C. Chadwick, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy debtor, appeals pro se the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's decision denying his motion to exempt state court receiver Hyman Danoff's real property lien from Chadwick's bankruptcy estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522 (f). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Chadwick contends that he was entitled to an undeclared homestead exemption from the lien under Cal.Code Civ.Proc. § 704.710 et seq. This contention lacks merit. The sale of Chadwick's real property was pursuant to a voluntary stipulation; therefore, the proceeds…