Michael Steven Milligan v. State of Oregon

Good Law
82 F.3d 423·1996 WL 154476·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21604
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 199695-35694California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

82 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael Steven MILLIGAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-35694. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Steven Milligan, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for injunctive relief. Because the district court subsequently dismissed Milligan's action, Milligan's interlocutory appeal is merged with the dismissal of the action. See Securities & Exch. Comm'n v. Mount Vernon Memorial Park, 664 F.2d 1358, 1361 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 (1982). Therefore, the appeal of the denial of his motion for injunctive relief is moot. See Mount Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan, 954 F.2d 1441 , 1450 (9th Cir.1992) (stating that when underlying claims have been decided, the reversal of a denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.