Queen v. Gomez
Opinion
Opinion
82 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles QUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. GOMEZ, individually and in his official capacity as director of the Department of Correction; K.W. Prunty, Warden, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Calipatria State Prison; Washington, Program Admin, individually and in his official capacity as Program Administrator at Calipatria State Prison; P. Tingey, Program Admin, individually and in his official capacity as Program Administrator at Calipatria Prison; C. Dominguez, individually and in her official capacity as Program Administrator at Calipatria State Prison; Nelson, Correction Officer, individually and in his official capacity as a Correction Officer; Huddleston, Correctional Officer, individually and in her official capacity as a Correctional Officer for the Department of Correction; Does, Does one through X-100, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55777. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.…