Queen v. Gomez

Good Law
82 F.3d 423·1996 WL 154531·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21607
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 199695-55777California1,495 words

Opinion

Opinion

82 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles QUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. GOMEZ, individually and in his official capacity as director of the Department of Correction; K.W. Prunty, Warden, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Calipatria State Prison; Washington, Program Admin, individually and in his official capacity as Program Administrator at Calipatria State Prison; P. Tingey, Program Admin, individually and in his official capacity as Program Administrator at Calipatria Prison; C. Dominguez, individually and in her official capacity as Program Administrator at Calipatria State Prison; Nelson, Correction Officer, individually and in his official capacity as a Correction Officer; Huddleston, Correctional Officer, individually and in her official capacity as a Correctional Officer for the Department of Correction; Does, Does one through X-100, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55777. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.