Leonel Antonio Murillo-Romero Holman Antonio Murillo-Sandoval v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

82 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leonel Antonio MURILLO-ROMERO; Holman Antonio Murillo-Sandoval, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70087. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leonel Antonio Murillo-Romero, and his son Holman Antonio Murillo-Sandoval, natives and citizens of Nicaragua, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the order of an immigration judge ("IJ"), denying their requests for asylum and withholding of deportation under sections 208(a) and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a), 1253(h). 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and deny the petitions for review. 3 Murillo-Romero contends that the BIA's adverse credibility determination is not…