United States v. Antonio Campos-Arrellano

82 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio CAMPOS-ARRELLANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30217. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio Campos-Arrellano appeals his one-year sentence following the district court's revocation of his supervised release. Campos-Arrellano contends that the district court erred because: (1) his sentence for revocation of supervised release combined with his sentence for the underlying offense of illegal reentry as a deported alien exceeds the maximum term for that offense, and (2) the district court abused its discretion by imposing a consecutive sentence and not a concurrent sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's interpretation of both statutes and the Sentencing…