Unigard Security Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance Company, a Foreign Corporation, Successor to Insurance Company of North America

Good Law
82 F.3d 423·1996 WL 162435·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21628
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 199694-35739California925 words

Opinion

Opinion

82 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNIGARD SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIGNA REINSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, successor to Insurance Company of North America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35739. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1995. Decided April 8, 1996. Before: WRIGHT, ALARCON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Unigard Security Insurance Company ("Unigard") appeals the district court's order denying its motion to vacate a portion of an arbitration award entered in proceedings between Unigard and CIGNA Reinsurance Company ("CIGNA"). The district court had jurisdiction to review the decision of the arbitration board pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 , et seq. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 We will not repeat the facts here because the parties are familiar with them. Unigard argues that the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.