Phoenix Marketing Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Company, a Washington Corporation

82 F.3d 423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PHOENIX MARKETING INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DR. PEPPER BOTTLING COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-36268. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 15, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This appeal from the denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. See Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002 , 1004-05 (9th Cir.1995). The record before us shows that the court did not rely on an erroneous legal premise or clearly erroneous findings of fact. See id. The court did not, moreover, abuse its discretion in concluding that appellant's showing of…