United States v. George Paul Salemo

82 F.3d 424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Paul SALEMO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10028. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 13, 1996. Decided April 10, 1996. Before: ALARCON, KLEINFELD and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Because the parties are familiar with the facts of this case, they will not be repeated here. In his pro se brief, Salemo raises a number of issues and subissues. We discuss each under separate heading. We affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed by the district court. 3 * The FDIC Insurance Evidence Was Sufficient 4 Salemo contends that the Government did not adequately prove that Citibank, Guardian Bank and Chase Bank were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). To support Salemo's conviction for making false statements to a financial institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 , the…