Rick A. Young v. Al Scamahorn Chase Riveland Tana Wood Al Walters Barbara Jonesson

Good Law
82 F.3d 424·1996 WL 154471·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21686
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 199695-35502California443 words

Opinion

Opinion

82 F.3d 424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rick A. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Al SCAMAHORN; Chase Riveland; Tana Wood; Al Walters; Barbara Jonesson, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35502. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 1, 1996. Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rick A. Young, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction in his civil rights action claiming prison officials retaliated against him for filing a previous action regarding exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke. Young contends the district court erred by refusing to: enjoin his transfer from the Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla, Washington; enjoin further retaliation; and sanction the defendants for violating a temporary restraining order. We affirm. 3 The district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that even though…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.