William Inglis & Sons Baking Company v. Continental Baking Company, Inc., Covington & Burling

82 F.3d 424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. WILLIAM INGLIS & SONS BAKING COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL BAKING COMPANY, INC., Covington & Burling, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16648. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1996. * Decided April 15, 1996. Before: CANBY, NOONAN and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Inglis & Sons Baking Company, Inc. ("Inglis") challenges on appeal the amount of its attorneys' fees award by the district court. Inglis further appeals the district court's determination of the date from which post-judgment interest should accrue. We affirm the district court's award of $100,000 in attorneys' fees, but we reverse the district court's determination regarding post-judgment interest. BACKGROUND 3 Inglis sued Continental for alleged violations of the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, and the California Unfair Practices Act.…