Garcia

Garcia v. Davis

Good Law
19 F. App'x 583
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 2001No. 00-16950; D.C. No. CV-99-02295-GEBCalifornia264 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Carlos Tomas Garcia appeals pro se the district court’s order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that prison officials violated his constitutional rights by conducting unwarranted strip searches in areas where others could view the searches. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s order dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l). See Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

The district court erred by dismissing Garcia’s claim that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights when, despite their knowledge that Garcia has a medical condition which prevents him from bending over, defendants required Garcia to bend over during unwarranted strip searches, thus subjecting him to excruciating pain and suffering. See Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312, 319 , 106 S.Ct. 1078 , 89 L.Ed.2d 251 (1986). We therefore reverse the district court’s dismissal on this claim, and remand for further proceedings.

The district court correctly found that defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.