Ahmadi

Ahmadi v. Ashcroft

Good Law
19 F. App'x 620
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 2001No. 00-70697; INS No. A75-104-999California256 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Issa Ahmadi, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(1), and we deny the petition.

Because the BIA conducted a de novo review of the IJ’s decision, we only review the decision of the BIA. De Leon-Barrios v. INS, 116 F.3d 391 , 393 (9th Cir.1997). We review factual findings supporting an asylum determination and a decision regarding withholding of deportation under a substantial evidence standard. Id. We must affirm the BIA if its decision is supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence in the record. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We can reverse the BIA’s factual findings only if evidence in the record “compels” a contrary conclusion. Id.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination. See De Leon-Barrios, 116 F.3d at 393-94. Furthermore, we conclude that Ahmadi failed to establish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.