Campbell
United States v. Campbell
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Donald W. Campbell appeals pro se the district court’s order, following a bench trial, permanently enjoining Campbell from occupying public lands and from grazing livestock on public lands without authorization. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .
We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s grant of a motion for a permanent injunction, but review any determination underlying the grant of the motion by the standard that applies to that determination. See Dare v. Cal., 191 F.3d 1167, 1170-71 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1190 , 121 S.Ct. 1187 , 149 L.Ed.2d 103 (2001). In reviewing a judgment following a bench trial, we review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo. See Tonry v. *640 Sec. Experts, Inc., 20 F.3d 967, 970 (9th Cir.1994). We affirm.
The Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) brought this action against Campbell seeking a court order to remove Campbell and his property from public lands located in the Burnt River Canyon, in Baker County, Oregon, and to enjoin him from establishing a residence on public lands in the future.