96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3120, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5161 Rosaura Gonzalez, Rosaura Gonzalez Gallegos Betty Jeaneth Catuse v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Bad Law
82 F.3d 903
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 3, 199694-70881California4,840 words

Opinion

Opinion

82 F.3d 903 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3120 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5161 Rosaura GONZALEZ, Rosaura Gonzalez Gallegos; Betty Jeaneth Catuse, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70881. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 15, 1996. Decided May 3, 1996. Lisa Schuh and Clinton J. Elliott, Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Arizona, for petitioners. Pauline Terrelonge and Joseph F. Ciolino, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Nos. Abr-vtr-tsf, Akl-fcp-lex. Before: THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, District Judge. * KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: 1 In this asylum case, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) erred regarding Rosaura Gonzalez Gallegos's petition by taking administrative notice of the effect of political changes in petitioner's country after she left, without giving her a fair opportunity to be heard. We, therefore, grant Gallegos's petition for review and remand the case. We deny Jeaneth Catuse's petition for review. FACTS 2 The petitioners are a mother, Mrs. Gallegos, and her adult…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.