Gaylin Burleson, and Jerry Lee Syrovatka, Sr. v. State of California Prison Industry Authority, Gary Jernigan, and Jerry Lee Syrovatka, Sr. v. State of California James H. Gomez Wayne Estelle, General Manager, Prison Industry Authority Jan Winter, Asst. General Manager of Operations, Prison Industry Board Ray Brown, Production Manager Ii, Prison Industry Authority Prison Industry Authority Joella Fazio David King William Allen John Babich Robert Burton Leonard Greenstone William Saracino Thomas Wornham

Good Law
83 F.3d 311·96 Daily Journal DAR 5341·3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 498·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10485·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3257
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 199695-16188California2,323 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 311 131 Lab.Cas. P 33,384 , 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 498, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3257 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5341 Gaylin BURLESON, Plaintiff, and Jerry Lee Syrovatka, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; Prison Industry Authority, Defendants-Appellees. Gary JERNIGAN, Plaintiff, and Jerry Lee Syrovatka, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; James H. Gomez; Wayne Estelle, General Manager, Prison Industry Authority; Jan Winter, Asst. General Manager of Operations, Prison Industry Board; Ray Brown, Production Manager II, Prison Industry Authority; Prison Industry Authority; Joella Fazio; David King; William Allen; John Babich; Robert Burton; Leonard Greenstone; William Saracino; Thomas Wornham, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 95-16188, 95-16192 and 95-16550. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 13, 1996. Decided May 8, 1996. Jason Rabinowitz, Mark A. Garver, Certified Law Students; Susan D. Christian, Supervising Attorney, University of California Davis School of Law, Davis, California, for plaintiff-appellant. Larry G. Raskin, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for defendants-appellees. Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.