Rangel-Morales

United States v. Rangel-Morales

Good Law
21 F. App'x 676
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 2001No. 01-10102; DC# CR-00-00095-HDMCalifornia256 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Juan Rangel-Morales appeals his 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm in part and remand in part.

Rangel-Morales contends that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the existence and nature of a prior felony conviction used to enhance his sentence must be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Rangel-Morales also contends that Apprendi limited Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) to its unique facts.

Rangel-Morales’ contentions, however, are foreclosed by our decisions in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir.) (applying plain error review), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1503 , 149 L.Ed.2d 388 (2001) and United States v. Arellano-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1119, 1127 (9th Cir.2001) (applying de novo review). The sentence therefore is affirmed.

Nevertheless, we sua sponte remand to the district court with instructions to correct the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.