Alvarado-Hernandez

United States v. Alvarado-Hernandez

Good Law
21 F. App'x 683
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 2001No. 01-30058; D.C. No. CR-00-00441-MJPCalifornia209 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Joel Alvarado-Hernandez appeals his 36-month and one week sentence following a guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Alvarado-Hernandez contends that the district court erroneously concluded it lacked the discretion to depart downward on the grounds of cultural assimilation under United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 730-31 (9th Cir.1998). The record in this case, however, shows that Alvarado-Hernandez’s cultural assimilation argument was presented to and considered by the district court; the district judge simply declined to exercise her discretion to depart downward based on the facts of the case. See United States v. Dubose, 146 F.3d 1141 , 1143 n. 1 (9th Cir.1998) (citation omitted) (stating that the district court’s decision not to depart downward was discretionary where the court “considered the proffered reasons for departure but found them lacking”).

Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to review the discretionary denial of Alvarado-Hernandez’s request for a downward departure. See United States v. Webster, 108 F.3d 1156, 1158 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.