Donlon

Donlon v. City of Oxnard

Good Law
22 F. App'x 741
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 2001No. 00-56226; D.C. No. CV-00-00607-DTCalifornia467 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Roger M. Donlon, various trustees, and other parties (the “Donlons”) appeal from the district court order dismissing their complaint. The Donlons filed their federal complaint after having lost a state court case in which they were the defendants. The state court determined that the Don-lons’ interest in a 181-acre plot of land located in the City of Oxnard was subordinate to Oxnard’s interest in the property, a tax lien. Both the California Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Thereafter, the Donlons brought suit in federal district court. Their first cause of action was for a judicial declaration that: 1) the state court’s ruling in the validation action is a final, binding judgment enforceable against Oxnard and 2) the Equal Protection Clause and/or Due Process Clause require that the special tax lien be subordinated to the Donlons’ interest in the property. The second cause of action was for a taking in violation of the Constitution. Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the district court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

District courts are courts of original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.