Banks v. Witt

83 F.3d 426 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfred BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John W. WITT; Stephanie Gareth; Detective Casey; Detective Cavada; Robert W. Burgreen; Glen Buries; Jerome E. Varon; Michael Goodman, Defendants, and County of San Diego; City of San Diego & Employees Penny Castleman; Robert Mulcahy, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55989. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alfred Banks appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of certain defendants in his action alleging entrapment, defamation, fraud, harassment, violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , and conspiracy to obstruct justice under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 . Banks also appeals the district court's denial of his motions for (1) recusal; (2) appointment of counsel; and (3) reconsideration. 1 We have jurisdiction…