Medjuck
United States v. Medjuck
22 F. App'x 872
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 2001No. 01-15051; D.C. No. CR-91-00552-1-VRWCalifornia89 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
We agree with the district court that Medjuck’s claim of being “tricked” constitutes a challenge to the district court’s ruling that the government could use the tape to impeach Medjuck if he testified. Because Medjuck did not testify, he did not preserve that issue for appeal. See *873 United States v. Johnson, 903 F.2d 1219, 1222-23 (9th Cir.1990).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.