Castle-Scott v. International Longshoreman's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 19

83 F.3d 426 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Candis CASTLE-SCOTT, Brad Bakken, Barry Brockmann, and Eugene Crotty, individually and on behalf of a class of people similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMAN'S AND WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION, LOCAL 19; the International Longshoreman's and Warehousemen's Union (International); and the Pacific Maritime Association, Defendants-Appellees No. 95-35327. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1996. Decided April 23, 1996. 1 Before: HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and RAFEEDIE, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** Introduction 3 This is a class action lawsuit brought on a "hybrid" theory of breach of the duty of fair representation against the labor union and breach of the collective bargaining agreement against the management. Appellants are longshoremen employed on an as-needed basis, and Appellees are the labor union and the maritime association of…