Froland

Froland v. Northeast Savings, F.A.

Good Law
83 F.3d 426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 1996426California212 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 426 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth Stanley FROLAND, Trustee of the Froland Family Trust of 1980, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORTHEAST SAVINGS, F.A. a Connecticut banking corp., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-56287. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1996. Decided April 12, 1996. Before: BEEZER, BRUNETTI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER * 2 The parties by and through their respective counsel have filed a written stipulation in this court which among other things provides for the dismissal of this appeal with prejudice. The court approves the settlement which requires further performance by the parties and supervisory proceedings in the district court. Now therefore, it is, 3 ORDERED that the above-captioned appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in supervision of the stipulated settlement of the parties. The mandate shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.