Charlotte Buckner v. County of Napa

83 F.3d 426 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charlotte BUCKNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF NAPA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15327. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. Decided April 18, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN, HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD * , District Judge. 2 ORDER ** 3 Charlotte Buckner, a correctional nurse with the Napa County Department of Public Health, appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of Napa County, the Department's Director of Nursing, Sharrie Pittman, the Department's Director of Health Services, R.S. Hill, MD and Allen Clemons, Buckner's immediate supervisor. Buckner brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violation of her First and Fourteenth Amendment rights including sexual harassment and retaliation for her expression of concerns regarding medical mistreatment of inmates. 4 The district court granted summary judgment for all four defendants…