Patterson

United States v. Patterson

Good Law
22 F. App'x 894
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 2001No. 01-10347; D.C. No. CR-99-00134-DWHCalifornia250 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Walter Watson Patterson appeals the 33-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Patterson contends that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”) amended 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(2), such that it describes a separate crime, not a sentencing factor. Patterson further contends that his sentence should not have been enhanced under subsection (b)(2) because it only applies to aliens who have been “removed” *895 and the indictment to which he pleaded guilty only alleged that he had been “deported.” We reject both contentions.

We previously concluded that subsection (b)(2) is a sentencing factor, see United States v. Arellano-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1119, 1127 (9th Cir.2001), and we are not persuaded by Patterson’s arguments to the contrary. Moreover, we have already determined that there is no legally significant difference between deportation and removal for purposes of § 1326, and thus, Patterson’s claim that subsection (b)(2) is not applicable to him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.