In Re Raymond Velmar Lund Madeline Ann Lund, Debtors. David Kuan v. Theodor C. Albert, Trustee

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Raymond Velmar LUND; Madeline Ann Lund, Debtors. David KUAN, Appellant, v. Theodor C. ALBERT, Trustee, Appellee. No. 95-55887. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Kuan, a former landlord and creditor of Chapter 7 debtors Raymond and Madeline Lund, appeals pro se a decision of the district court affirming an order of the bankruptcy court approving a compromise of a controversy. The controversy involved the allocation of $25,000 in proceeds received by Raymond Lund as a settlement of a legal malpractice action brought by Lund against Lund's attorney. The Lunds and the trustee divided the $25,000. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) and affirm. 3 A "bankruptcy court's order approving the trustee's application to compromise [a] controversy is reviewed for…