Raza Iqbal v. Berkeley Marina Marriott Management Mark Lucus Kimberly Caldwell Brenda Miller Sheldon Bright

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raza IQBAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BERKELEY MARINA MARRIOTT MANAGEMENT; Mark Lucus; Kimberly Caldwell; Brenda Miller; Sheldon Bright, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15823. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raza Iqbal appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 Iqbal contends that the district court erred by concluding that he failed to present specific, substantial evidence that defendants' explanation for his termination was a pretext for discrimination. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the district court properly…