Low v. Clark
Opinion
Opinion
83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tony R. LOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P. CLARK; Conway; French; C. Johnson; K. Salinas; Jourden; Smith; Long, Jr.; G. Sandor; Charles D. Marshall, Warden; James Rowland, Dir. CA Dept. of Corrections; Rowland, Sergeant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16077. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tony R. Low, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging the use of excessive force and deliberate indifference to inmate safety. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 With respect to Low's Eighth Amendment claims alleging deliberate indifference to inmate…