Hutchings von Ludwitz v. State of Arizona

Good Law
83 F.3d 427
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 1996427California385 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William E. HUTCHINGS VON LUDWITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Unknown Officers of Pima County Arizona Child Services Division; Jack Williams, Governor, Arizona, 1974, in his individual capacity, his heirs, survivors and successor in office; Raul Castro, Arizona Governor, 1975--1977, in his individual capacity, his heirs, survivors, and his successor in office; Wesly Bolin, Arizona Governor, 1977-1978, in his individual capacity, his heirs, survivors, and his heirs, survivors, and his successor in office, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15329. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William E. Hutchings von Ludwitz appeals pro se the district court 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d) dismissal of his civil rights action against Arizona state officials. Hutchings von Ludwitz contends that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.