Holterman v. Hall

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel Lee HOLTERMAN; Paul Julian Maney, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Frank HALL; Carlton Zenon, Superintendent Oregon State Correctional Institution; Louis Menza, Lieutenant, Oregon State Correctional Institution; John Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Lee Holterman and Paul Julian Maney appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging racially-discriminatory cell-assignment practices. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. ("FDIC") v. Henderson, 940 F.2d 465, 471 (9th Cir.1991). 4 Holterman and Maney contend that the district court erred by finding that they had…