McCarthy v. State of Ariz.

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles MCCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; University Physicians Inc.; University Medical Center Corporation; Hugo Villar, Dr.; Richard Mandell, Dr.; Arizona Center for Disability Law, aka Center for Law; Charles Carbone; Jack Dillenberg, aka Jack Dillenburg; Arthur Kinneberg, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15606. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles McCarthy appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of prosecution in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that his civil rights were violated by the State of Arizona, its University Medical Center and various other defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 The district court's March 13, 1995 order, which dismissed McCarthy's claims against one defendant and granted McCarthy…