In Re Mir Kazem Kashani Habibeh S. Kashani, Debtors, Mir Kazem Kashani Habibeh S. Kashani v. Radmila A. Fulton, Trustee Resolution Trust Corporation

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Mir Kazem KASHANI; Habibeh S. Kashani, Debtors, Mir Kazem KASHANI; Habibeh S. Kashani, Appellants, v. Radmila A. FULTON, Trustee; Resolution Trust Corporation, Appellees. No. 94-56598. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Chapter 11 debtors Mir Kazem Kashani and Habibeh S. Kashani appeal pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") decision affirming the bankruptcy court's award of attorney fees to Chapter 11 Trustee Radmila Fulton and her counsel. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 3 This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) to review appeals arising from final decisions, judgments, and orders of the BAP. See 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d). The BAP's affirmance of a bankruptcy court's interlocutory order is not a final order under section 158(d). See Security…