Alfonso Geraldo Keer v. R. Hogland L.A. Sandoval, Correctional Officer

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfonso Geraldo KEER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. HOGLAND; L.A. Sandoval, Correctional Officer, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-15452. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Alfonso Geraldo Keer appeals pro se the district court's judgments in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Keer contends the district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant Hogland after determining that Keer was lawfully subjected to a prison lockdown. Keer also contends the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his claim against defendant Sandoval. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review a district court's summary judgment de novo. Hervey v. Estes, 65 F.3d 784, 788 (9th Cir.1995). We review a district court's dismissal of…