McCarthy v. Brown

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles McCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael BROWN; George Miller; Katrina Richter; The Board of Adjustment for the City of Tucson; Thomas Parsons; Superior Court of Pima County; State of Arizona; State Bar of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15607. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles McCarthy appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the State of Arizona, the Arizona State Bar, the Superior Court of Pima County, and several other governmental entities and individuals conspired to violate his civil rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 It is difficult to discern McCarthy's specific contentions on appeal because his brief is somewhat unintelligible. 1 Nonetheless,…