Mark Gary Hough v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark Gary HOUGH, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70248. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark Gary Hough, a native and citizen of Great Britain, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (the "BIA") decision affirming an immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of Hough's request for waiver of deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c). Hough, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, contends that the BIA erred by affirming the IJ's decision because: (1) he presented outstanding equities to overcome the effect of his convictions for possession of stolen property; and (2) he was denied representation at his deportation hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review the BIA's balancing…